Ball99999
11-18-2012, 04:54 AM
(all diagram lines are just guesses)
So frustrated. Everywhere I look on the internet I get the impression from ads and reviews that heavyballs "outhook" such and such previous ball by x boards etc. But I just find that the stronger balls I have, the less they hook. To me it seems more like they have more traction for heavy oil but not more hook, while the medium oil balls just ignore trying to create traction and then save their energy and make a big move off of the friction at the end... so they have MORE "hook" from right to left.
First ball was a Brunswick Damage. A pearl, high RG, pin up, "medium-light oil" ball. My initial impressions were that on heavy oil the ball would just sail straight and not hook. Then when the lanes broke down it really went down the lane cleanly and then made a big curve/move at the end. Loved this.
Look at this diagram, it represents a few things, 1) the blue line is how I *thought* heavy oil balls would hook on heavy oil 2) the yellow line is how the Damage seems like on really heavy oil 3) the blue line also represents how the Damage hooks in medium-dry oil.
http://i.imgur.com/mIfV9.jpg
Then if you look at this diagram, it represents how I feel people are saying heavy oil balls are in reality, keeping traction in the heavy oil but expending energy at the same time meaning a less big move in the back end but still power left over.
http://i.imgur.com/zkkl7.jpg
Then this is just to show a heavy oil ball in dry oil.. going into a roll too early and losing all energy.
http://i.imgur.com/Ym0TO.jpg
SO after all this, what I want to know is, WHERE do people get the heavy oil balls = bigger back end moves thing? Is it because the people in the videos have insanely high revs?
If my ideas are correct, for low-medium rev players, would a medium oil ball on medium oil be better for strikes than a heavy oil ball on heavy oil because entry angle would be bigger?
So frustrated. Everywhere I look on the internet I get the impression from ads and reviews that heavyballs "outhook" such and such previous ball by x boards etc. But I just find that the stronger balls I have, the less they hook. To me it seems more like they have more traction for heavy oil but not more hook, while the medium oil balls just ignore trying to create traction and then save their energy and make a big move off of the friction at the end... so they have MORE "hook" from right to left.
First ball was a Brunswick Damage. A pearl, high RG, pin up, "medium-light oil" ball. My initial impressions were that on heavy oil the ball would just sail straight and not hook. Then when the lanes broke down it really went down the lane cleanly and then made a big curve/move at the end. Loved this.
Look at this diagram, it represents a few things, 1) the blue line is how I *thought* heavy oil balls would hook on heavy oil 2) the yellow line is how the Damage seems like on really heavy oil 3) the blue line also represents how the Damage hooks in medium-dry oil.
http://i.imgur.com/mIfV9.jpg
Then if you look at this diagram, it represents how I feel people are saying heavy oil balls are in reality, keeping traction in the heavy oil but expending energy at the same time meaning a less big move in the back end but still power left over.
http://i.imgur.com/zkkl7.jpg
Then this is just to show a heavy oil ball in dry oil.. going into a roll too early and losing all energy.
http://i.imgur.com/Ym0TO.jpg
SO after all this, what I want to know is, WHERE do people get the heavy oil balls = bigger back end moves thing? Is it because the people in the videos have insanely high revs?
If my ideas are correct, for low-medium rev players, would a medium oil ball on medium oil be better for strikes than a heavy oil ball on heavy oil because entry angle would be bigger?