GeoLes
11-29-2012, 03:34 PM
Okay, forgive the "newb" question, but I gotta know.
I am a 6,4, right-handed bowler who rolls a 15-lb ball (if that is relevant). I am probably a "tweener". I was originally taught to "stoke" with a 4-step approach. As I found more release control, I discovered 3 steps to be more efficient. I have also moved a couple of markers further left on the approach in order to roll the ball though the 2nd arrow with greater Axis rotation. I recently read a Slowinski article on 5-step approach, which is basically 4-steps with a prefix step to get you down the approach, as I see it. I tend to stand mid-way on the approach, pretty close to the end of the ball return in order to finish near the foul line.
I guess I have two questions. I still feel most comfortable with 3 steps, as the ball seems to swing more naturally, and effortlessly. (On 4-steps, I feel like I am holding the ball back during the swing). By switching to Slowinski's 5 step approach, I am essentially returning to a 4 step approach in terms of swing/step timing. Is it feasiblle to use a 3-step timing with 5 steps? (in other words, two steps before pushing off). I practiced 5 steps with pushoff on 2, this afternoon and got tripped up a couple of times. It also felt like I was really manually contolling the swing to keep it smooth. I think would fare better with 3 as it feels more effortless. Also, I can use more of the approach to fnish with more ball speed down lane.
Am I on target? Spinning fairy tales? Thoughts?
I am a 6,4, right-handed bowler who rolls a 15-lb ball (if that is relevant). I am probably a "tweener". I was originally taught to "stoke" with a 4-step approach. As I found more release control, I discovered 3 steps to be more efficient. I have also moved a couple of markers further left on the approach in order to roll the ball though the 2nd arrow with greater Axis rotation. I recently read a Slowinski article on 5-step approach, which is basically 4-steps with a prefix step to get you down the approach, as I see it. I tend to stand mid-way on the approach, pretty close to the end of the ball return in order to finish near the foul line.
I guess I have two questions. I still feel most comfortable with 3 steps, as the ball seems to swing more naturally, and effortlessly. (On 4-steps, I feel like I am holding the ball back during the swing). By switching to Slowinski's 5 step approach, I am essentially returning to a 4 step approach in terms of swing/step timing. Is it feasiblle to use a 3-step timing with 5 steps? (in other words, two steps before pushing off). I practiced 5 steps with pushoff on 2, this afternoon and got tripped up a couple of times. It also felt like I was really manually contolling the swing to keep it smooth. I think would fare better with 3 as it feels more effortless. Also, I can use more of the approach to fnish with more ball speed down lane.
Am I on target? Spinning fairy tales? Thoughts?