Aslan
03-11-2015, 06:26 PM
I thought I'd post about a rather unique situation I've come across.
I started out in a non-sanctioned league at an AMF Center. I average 135. The general consensus was that the center "Flooded" the lanes. After bowling many centers in the area...I'd say they had the 3rd heaviest/longest pattern in terms of oil. They also had the reputation of not many perfect games being bowled there recently. Since I left...Bowlmor bought them and the place, at least aestitically, has really improved...and I decided to join a sanctioned league there starting tonight.
My home center (private) used to be wood lanes. It had the opposite reputation...almost like bowling on a playground slide...if ya miss right 7-9 boards...no worries.
While averaging 135 at the AMF center...I average 166 at the private center.
THEN...the private center put in synthetic lanes. At first, they seemed to be very dry synthetics...still alot of hook...just a little less miss room. But, it seemed like people from this center would still struggle when they went to sweeps in Vegas...so I "think" the center decided to maybe put a harder shot out. At the same time...they decided to just "flood" (their words) the lanes in the morning and not oil the rest of the day...even before evening leagues.
This has created a very difficult shot. A flat pattern almost out to 30-40ft...all the way to the 2-board. And because they don't do anything to the lanes prior to league play...the oil (especially on the right side...statistically more RHers out there) simply gets pushed UP the lane from house balls over the course of the day. There is not "breakpoint"...any dry that exists is so far UP near the pin deck...that even if you hit it...you're too far down the lane to benefit.
Statitical evidence? Of 172 bowlers...only TWO average over 200. Only 7 average over 190. In the wood lane era...the old pro shop owner used to average 207-217 each season. Last I checked he averages in the 180s now. My average has dropped from 165/166 down to 161/162.
The AMF center...probably because of THEIR reputation and the new ownership has admittingly been "tinkering" (their words) with their pattern. This has led to my 300-game in practice...and from what I hear...a LOT of 300s...some back to back 300s even. A pro shop guy that bowled there in a travel league claims the shot "is probably not legal. Too short and too narrow."
So this next season is going to be very intriguing. IF both centers hold true to their new philosophies...I anticipate a 30-pin difference in average from one center to the next. While in the private center I generally am standing left foot on the 10-11 board and throwing up the 7-8 board...with 0-1 board of miss room on either side....in the AMF center I'll be standing 2-3 boards left and aiming for 7. And based on my Sunday experience (which was on a fairly fresh pattern even though it was the weekend), the miss room left was only 1-2 boards...but the miss room right was 6-9 boards.
So, we'll see. It would be nice if the USBC and BPAA would do a little better to regulate and specify conditions for sanctioned league play...but I figure the odds of that are 1% or less...so it is what it is.
I started out in a non-sanctioned league at an AMF Center. I average 135. The general consensus was that the center "Flooded" the lanes. After bowling many centers in the area...I'd say they had the 3rd heaviest/longest pattern in terms of oil. They also had the reputation of not many perfect games being bowled there recently. Since I left...Bowlmor bought them and the place, at least aestitically, has really improved...and I decided to join a sanctioned league there starting tonight.
My home center (private) used to be wood lanes. It had the opposite reputation...almost like bowling on a playground slide...if ya miss right 7-9 boards...no worries.
While averaging 135 at the AMF center...I average 166 at the private center.
THEN...the private center put in synthetic lanes. At first, they seemed to be very dry synthetics...still alot of hook...just a little less miss room. But, it seemed like people from this center would still struggle when they went to sweeps in Vegas...so I "think" the center decided to maybe put a harder shot out. At the same time...they decided to just "flood" (their words) the lanes in the morning and not oil the rest of the day...even before evening leagues.
This has created a very difficult shot. A flat pattern almost out to 30-40ft...all the way to the 2-board. And because they don't do anything to the lanes prior to league play...the oil (especially on the right side...statistically more RHers out there) simply gets pushed UP the lane from house balls over the course of the day. There is not "breakpoint"...any dry that exists is so far UP near the pin deck...that even if you hit it...you're too far down the lane to benefit.
Statitical evidence? Of 172 bowlers...only TWO average over 200. Only 7 average over 190. In the wood lane era...the old pro shop owner used to average 207-217 each season. Last I checked he averages in the 180s now. My average has dropped from 165/166 down to 161/162.
The AMF center...probably because of THEIR reputation and the new ownership has admittingly been "tinkering" (their words) with their pattern. This has led to my 300-game in practice...and from what I hear...a LOT of 300s...some back to back 300s even. A pro shop guy that bowled there in a travel league claims the shot "is probably not legal. Too short and too narrow."
So this next season is going to be very intriguing. IF both centers hold true to their new philosophies...I anticipate a 30-pin difference in average from one center to the next. While in the private center I generally am standing left foot on the 10-11 board and throwing up the 7-8 board...with 0-1 board of miss room on either side....in the AMF center I'll be standing 2-3 boards left and aiming for 7. And based on my Sunday experience (which was on a fairly fresh pattern even though it was the weekend), the miss room left was only 1-2 boards...but the miss room right was 6-9 boards.
So, we'll see. It would be nice if the USBC and BPAA would do a little better to regulate and specify conditions for sanctioned league play...but I figure the odds of that are 1% or less...so it is what it is.