Aslan
02-23-2017, 08:28 PM
Even though I've swept many times in Vegas, most of my experience has been at The Orleans and Gold Coast...but I've also bowled at South Pointe and Red Rock. This March, I'll be sweeping at Sam's Town twice.
My current arsenal was "constructed" with two main things in mind:
1) I kept some of the variables constant (Pearl covers, assymetric, 2.49 RG) so I could evaluate more closely other variables (manufacturer variance, differential, and PerfectScale).
2) My arsenal was designed to perform well at the house I bowl at 2 out of 3 times a week. It's an older house, light/low oil synthetics, and the lanes tend to transition quickly.
With that in mind, the "progression" is to start with the Radical Reax Pearl (2.492 RG, 0.054 diff., 224.8 PS, 4000 OOB) on the fresh...then when the lanes start to transition, I move to the Ebonite Innovate (2.49 RG, 0.041 diff., 189.9 PS, 2000 OOB). When/If there is enough "carry-down", I switch to the Hammer Scandal Pearl (2.49 RG, 0.047 diff., 231.9 PS, 500/polished OOB).
The Reax Pearl has done rather well at this house.
Stats: > 40 games, 194.95 average, 46% strike rate.
The Innovate started out strong, but quickly developed a pronounced track, started losing power, and it took me some time to fix my ball spinner so I could resurface it. It does seem to be significantly weaker than either the Reax Pearl or Scandal Pearl...leading me to believe that the significantly lower differential is an impactful spec.
Stats: > 35 games, 184.58 average, 46% strike rate.
The Scandal Pearl replaced the Rotogrip Defiant Edge...which was a very disappointing ball. Like my last attempt at throwing a Rotogrip ball (Asylum), the ball just hooked too soon and hit the pocket like a wet tissue. The Scandal Pearl, on the other hand, has been a monster.
Stats: ~ 15 games, 190.00 average, 50% strike rate.
In contrast, with the Defiant Edge, in < 10 games, I averaged 162.00 with a measly 32% strike rate.
So....back to the main question. This arsenal/progression was designed with this house in mind...and now I'm going to be bowling at Sam's Town...which I have no experience with...but it's almost certainly going to be a "slicker/wider/longer" pattern than what I'm used to. So, I have to figure out a couple things:
1) Do I want to alter the surfaces on my current progression? They are working well as is...do I want to "mess with them" to adapt them to Sam's Town? If so, how should I "mess with them"?
2) Of the other 16lb retired balls that I have sitting around...should I bring them with me...and maybe start out with something with a solid or hybrid cover...maybe something with more surface?
The options I have are:
Hammer Rhythm (sym, solid, 2.5 RG, 0.04 diff., 211 PS, 2000 OOB)
900Global Bullet Train (sym, hybrid, 2.55 RG, 0.04 diff., 222.8 PS, 2500 OOB)
Columbia300 Encounter (asym, pearl, 2.51 RG, 0.047 diff., 203.8 PS, 2000 OOB)
I don't think the Encounter is going to give me much different of a look than my current progression. But, I could take the Rhythm and the Bullet Train...maybe add some surface to each...and try them first on fresh.
Should I just use my current progression? Should I "mess with the surface" in my current progression?, Should I bring the Rhythm and/or Bullet Train? Should I add surface to the Rhythm and/or Bullet Train? If so, what surfacing would you recommend?
My concern is that my "progression" is based greatly on the conditions I usually bowl on...which are likely NOT the conditions I'll see at Sam's Town. And given that all 3 of my balls are similar in their core symmetry, RG, and cover...it leaves me with less of an ability to adapt them to other conditions. Yet, the 'retired' options I have...are older balls that likely don't have the same 'power' of the newer balls that are currently in my progression. I'd also be introducing a slight variable by using the retired balls...since only the Bullet Train is drilled for the VISE inserts...the Rhythm has a slightly different layout...and the Encounter has a different thumb pitch.
My current arsenal was "constructed" with two main things in mind:
1) I kept some of the variables constant (Pearl covers, assymetric, 2.49 RG) so I could evaluate more closely other variables (manufacturer variance, differential, and PerfectScale).
2) My arsenal was designed to perform well at the house I bowl at 2 out of 3 times a week. It's an older house, light/low oil synthetics, and the lanes tend to transition quickly.
With that in mind, the "progression" is to start with the Radical Reax Pearl (2.492 RG, 0.054 diff., 224.8 PS, 4000 OOB) on the fresh...then when the lanes start to transition, I move to the Ebonite Innovate (2.49 RG, 0.041 diff., 189.9 PS, 2000 OOB). When/If there is enough "carry-down", I switch to the Hammer Scandal Pearl (2.49 RG, 0.047 diff., 231.9 PS, 500/polished OOB).
The Reax Pearl has done rather well at this house.
Stats: > 40 games, 194.95 average, 46% strike rate.
The Innovate started out strong, but quickly developed a pronounced track, started losing power, and it took me some time to fix my ball spinner so I could resurface it. It does seem to be significantly weaker than either the Reax Pearl or Scandal Pearl...leading me to believe that the significantly lower differential is an impactful spec.
Stats: > 35 games, 184.58 average, 46% strike rate.
The Scandal Pearl replaced the Rotogrip Defiant Edge...which was a very disappointing ball. Like my last attempt at throwing a Rotogrip ball (Asylum), the ball just hooked too soon and hit the pocket like a wet tissue. The Scandal Pearl, on the other hand, has been a monster.
Stats: ~ 15 games, 190.00 average, 50% strike rate.
In contrast, with the Defiant Edge, in < 10 games, I averaged 162.00 with a measly 32% strike rate.
So....back to the main question. This arsenal/progression was designed with this house in mind...and now I'm going to be bowling at Sam's Town...which I have no experience with...but it's almost certainly going to be a "slicker/wider/longer" pattern than what I'm used to. So, I have to figure out a couple things:
1) Do I want to alter the surfaces on my current progression? They are working well as is...do I want to "mess with them" to adapt them to Sam's Town? If so, how should I "mess with them"?
2) Of the other 16lb retired balls that I have sitting around...should I bring them with me...and maybe start out with something with a solid or hybrid cover...maybe something with more surface?
The options I have are:
Hammer Rhythm (sym, solid, 2.5 RG, 0.04 diff., 211 PS, 2000 OOB)
900Global Bullet Train (sym, hybrid, 2.55 RG, 0.04 diff., 222.8 PS, 2500 OOB)
Columbia300 Encounter (asym, pearl, 2.51 RG, 0.047 diff., 203.8 PS, 2000 OOB)
I don't think the Encounter is going to give me much different of a look than my current progression. But, I could take the Rhythm and the Bullet Train...maybe add some surface to each...and try them first on fresh.
Should I just use my current progression? Should I "mess with the surface" in my current progression?, Should I bring the Rhythm and/or Bullet Train? Should I add surface to the Rhythm and/or Bullet Train? If so, what surfacing would you recommend?
My concern is that my "progression" is based greatly on the conditions I usually bowl on...which are likely NOT the conditions I'll see at Sam's Town. And given that all 3 of my balls are similar in their core symmetry, RG, and cover...it leaves me with less of an ability to adapt them to other conditions. Yet, the 'retired' options I have...are older balls that likely don't have the same 'power' of the newer balls that are currently in my progression. I'd also be introducing a slight variable by using the retired balls...since only the Bullet Train is drilled for the VISE inserts...the Rhythm has a slightly different layout...and the Encounter has a different thumb pitch.