Originally Posted by
ArtVandelay
In what regard though? Are we going by pure numbers? Talent? What? I mean, you almost have to break it up into all the different sports.
But I'll get this started with someone no one will see coming. The greatest athlete of all time (in a major sport, hockey, baseball, football or basketball) is Mario Lemieux.
The guy had it all. The size, the reach, the power, the speed. The only thing he didn't have was health. If he had Gretzky's health, if he had Gretzky's help (for the most part, Lemieux played his career with relative unknowns, it wasn't until the penguins took Jagr that he had a TRUE weapon to work with. Gretzky had all kinds of help, not the least of which was some guy named Messier), he would have had all of Gretzky's records. The guy was a monster on the ice, and perhaps the most feared player ever, in the open ice. He played on days when he could hardly lace up his own skates, his back hurt so bad. He beat Hodgkin's disease. He made a comeback and showed that even though he was older and slower, he was still amazing. There's simply too much to say about the guy, he was amazing in every aspect of the word. Sadly, his career can be summed up in just two words: What if?
Hockey players are the most talented athletes of the major sports. Batting, in baseball, is the single most difficult thing to do in sports, but when you combine every aspect of a sport, hockey players are the best athletes. They have to combine skating, hitting, eye and hand coordination, spacing, you name it.... You can't look at the puck when you're carrying it (are you listening Mr. Lindros?????), you will get killed. Head up, believe it's there, feel it on the stick.
So there you have it. Your thoughts?
Bookmarks