@ftlob- Thats a great idea. I think if I end up getting them plugged, I might do that.
This thumb issue has been an ongoing problem.
My first ball- The thumb hole felt too tight so I tried to have it enlarged. But the ball driller claimed it was because I was gripping it too tightly. Finally he agreed to widen it a small bit and it seemed fine.
Then I had MWhite drill up the Rhythm and the thumb seemed fine.
Then he drilled the Slingshot tri-grip and made the thumb hole bigger…and thats when it started to be too loose so I was using 3-6 pieces of tape.
Then MWhite drilled the two Encounters, the thumbhole was drilled a little larger, again the thumb hole seemed too big and I needed to use tape.
Now, it wasn't MWhite's fault because each time he did a great job of fitting me…and the thumbhole size chosen seemed like a good fit.
But I think I was pinching during the fitting. And to MWhite's credit, he diagnosed my pinching problem before the coach ever did. Even the first guy I had drill my first ball was probably correct that the hole size was fine and it was just me "gripping/pinching".
It's weird. It made me think about an article I recently read in "Bowling This Month". And I started thinking about "why" I listened to this coach and NOT the first coach. And what it came to is; that first coach was a 200+ average bowler…but I didn't see him at the same level of a PBA pro. So while I listened to him and tried to do what he taught me…it was easy to give up on his recommendations and just say to my self; "Oh well. That guy doesn't really know what he's talking about." Yet with the PBA pro coach…no matter what they say, you're thinking, "Yes! I HAVE to do this. This is coming from a truly elite bowler." Like when I go to the Saturday clinic and get advice from Barry Asher, or Mark Baker, or John Gaines. No matter what they tell you…you feel like you MUST listen to them.
But it's more than that. With that first coach…I felt like he was trying to make me and everyone else he coached a replica of him. It felt like he didn't care what was best for me…he was only interested in getting me to do what HE does. The new coach looked at my game…and took ONE thing…ONE thing that stood out…and offered advice on how to fix it. THAT is powerful coaching…because;
1) It's coming from someone with "street cred"…somebody who's been at the top of the mountain. If a person climbs Mt. Everest…and then offers you a tip on mountain climbing…you TAKE it. And if you later take a community class on mountain climbing and the instructor counters that advice…you're less likely to change your mind because you know that instructor has never climbed Mt. Everest. May be a GREAT teacher…but those that can do, those that can't teach right?? Whether you agree or disagree (and I actually sort of disagree to some extent because I think there is an art to teaching)…it's prevalent with many people either consciously or sub-consciously.
2) There was good back and forth. I don't think you can be a truly effective teacher if you aren't willing to listen at least 10% of a lesson. It's hard sometimes when you're at a high level and the student seems to be arguing or resisting. But in that 10% you spend listening…sometimes you can learn a great deal about what you should be teaching, how to teach it, and what might actually "stick" or won't "stick".
Thats my take anyways.
E.T.A.: Realize that I credited the new coach with working on just ONE thing yet with Rob he had multiple suggestions. Realize with Rob, the lesson was a 1-2x per year thing…so he had to give me many things to work on. If he lived closer, and I was getting 2 lessons a month…I can assure you (since he specifically stated it) there wouldn't have been a page of 4-9 things to work on before the next lesson.
Bookmarks