Storm's Step 2 Has a coarser grit in it and takes the ball from a 320 base grit to 1500.
Reacta Shine doesn't do that, it is just a 1500 grit polish
These compounds, Rough Buff & Step 2 & clean'n sheen, are more like ultra aggressive polishes. They smooth out the underlying surface very quickly and very aggressively. They use a diminishing type grit which constantly breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces as you use it.
(The new royal compound would be in this group also)
Normal abrasive polishes, like Brunswick Factory Finish High gloss polish and Storm's Xtra Shine, have abrasives in the polish, but their main job is to polish. They do smooth the surface but not as much, nor as aggressively as Rough Buff and Step 2.
Reacta-Shine is a cleaner polish and only has a very fine grit in it.
Now if you didn't have Reacta-Shine you could get away with using Step #2 like Rob said. But you can't substitute Reacta-Shine for Step #2
It all depends on what the underlaying grit is.
Look at it this way, you can use reacta shine to maintain the surface, not to get it to that in the first place.
Step 2 it has a coarser grit in it, if you tried to take a ball sanded at 320 up to 1500 with just reacta shine it would take a long long long time.storm's Step 2 has grit in it and it takes a ball from 320, to 1500, (can you explain how it does that ???)
Reacta shine is a cleaner/polish with a finer grit to it
320 -1500 are referring to sandpaper gritsWhen you talking 320 1500, are you referring to sand paper, or abralon pad?
In abralon those would be about 500 - 3000
No you still have to sand the ball, the underlaying textures of the other grits used are what get you to the final surface you want.So Storm's step 2 does away with the need to sand the ball??? I guess you would at the least do the four side technique?
Bookmarks