We are talking about degrees of accomplishment here, and points of perspective. No offense to your son, Michael, but I wonder if his average might have been over 200 had he received coaching? And I wonder what his average will be next year? Will he be consistent? Or is this "beginner's luck?" Sooner or later, if we excel at something naturally, we do begin to think about it and make tiny corrections. Will he know what corrections to make? When average mistakes begin to plague him (as they do everyone), will he know what corrections are best, or will he simply try harder at doing what he's always done, hoping that THIS time, it'll magically work?
Aslan's more or less correct here, I think: everyone has a ceiling. Where he's off track is implying that the ceiling is made of steel. It's usually not; it's generally made of rubber and can be stretched with proper attention (coaching). I used to teach music. I've had several students who were told they'd never be able to carry a tune -- they just didn't have the raw "gift" of musical ability. I taught all of them to sing on-pitch. Sing professionally? No. Sing "well?" Probably not. But at least they were no longer afraid to sing in the shower.
Coaching isn't about "getting everyone to the Tour." It's not about "having everyone reach a 250 average." It's about simple improvement -- whatever that means for the individual. If one is naturally gifted, coaching will take one far. If one is a klutz, coaching will abate embarrassment. It's not "one or the other"; it's "both/and."
Bookmarks