Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Jason Couch is bitter

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aslan View Post
    I think Couch is probably more bitter about his own career than Belmo. Not many bowlers had more potential when they debuted than Jason Couch. And while he's had a good career…I think he sees Belmo's success/debut/popularity and recognizes that maybe he hasn't lived up to the hype/expectations.

    But, I respect that he spoke his mind. I think too many PBA players are afraid to criticize 2-handed bowling or Belmo because he's the PBA's "golden goose".
    Jason couch has 16 career national titles including 4 majors and was ranked 24th on the all time list of greatest pba players. All time 21st in wins and 10th in earnings. He has been inducted to the pba and usbc hall of fame as well. I would say that is way beyond a good career.
    Last edited by fortheloveofbowling; 03-23-2015 at 01:23 AM.

  2. #12
    Bowling God Aslan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Hutchinson, KS
    Posts
    7,123
    Chats: 204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fortheloveofbowling View Post
    Jason couch has 16 career national titles including 4 majors and was ranked 24th on the all time list of greatest pba players. All time 21st in wins and 10th in earnings. He has been inducted to the pba and usbc hall of fame as well. I would say that is way beyond a good career.
    With those numbers, it would appear he's better than Belmo. But I bet if you posted a oll on that topic; the percentages would be:

    Belmo is better = 98%
    Couch is better = 1%
    Who is Jason Couch? = 1%

    Thats what I meant by why a guy like Couch might be bitter. And I agree with him. Far too many people have crowned Belmo before he's paid his dues…and there are a lot of great, great bowlers that have been forgotten prematurely.

  3. #13
    Ringer swingset's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Central Ohio
    Posts
    365
    Chats: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike White View Post
    He is far from deadly accurate.

    Look at the number of times he leaves a WEAK 10 pin, only to get a messenger to take it out.

    The fact that he had a messenger at all indicates that he missed, because the headpin should transfer most of it's energy into the 2 pin, but since he hit light, the head pin just glanced off the 2 pin, and maintained plenty of energy to fly back across the deck.

    I blame ABC/USBC for falling asleep when ball companies presented resin balls.

    The change in friction between the ball and the lane has completely changed the game from one of art, into pure power. That acheivable increase in effective power is what allows Belmo to launch headpins off of the side walls, and increase his carry %.

    Then to make things worse, they put even more oil on the lane to compensate for what would otherwise be an unusable ball, and ALLOW that oil to guide the ball down the lane.

    High rev rate was achievable long before the thumbless style was around. It just wasn't as effective due to the lower friction between the ball and the lane. It was actually not hard to over-rev the ball so it skidded further.

    What we didn't see was high revs, high speed, and significant ball reaction at the same time.

    Using the equipment pre-resin, Belmo's technique (unchanged) would result in a 150-160 bowler, with trouble getting the 5 pin consistently. And that would be with the oil patterns in use pre-resin (much less volume of oil)

    His rev rate in the 500's, would only be effective in the 14-15mph range, and at that speed, you can forget launching messengers. That means his weak 10 pin shots would remain weak 10 pins.
    Belmonte is thriving in a condition that he had no hand in setting up, he's just brought his talent to the table and is winning with it. It's not 2-hands producing all those wins, or Osku and the other 2-handers would be dominating. They're not.

    The power players are usually at the top of the leaderboards, on that we agree and today's game is a power game at the highest level, but then was it preferable that years ago it was a low-friction game? If so, why? Why is one better than the other?

    Isn't the point still beating the field? It is, the conditions and equipment are merely the tools you use to achieve that, so every player starting out on resin has to build his skillset with that in mind.

    I'm not seeing a problem. In fact, I think every player out there has the same opportunity to be Belmo that Belmo does. Why aren't they?

  4. #14

    Default

    I agree completely. He's not dominating because he uses two hands, he dominating because he uses two hands and HE'S THAT GOOD!

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobLV1 View Post
    I agree completely. He's not dominating because he uses two hands, he dominating because he uses two hands and HE'S THAT GOOD!
    Yep

    I can understand some resentment towards him because of his style. Heck it's not for everyone. But you have to respect what he has done. I think he's gotten into a lot of the other bowlers heads. When you get to the pro level where most of the pros can strike 70-80% of the time it's that extra mental edge that decides who the champion is.

  6. #16
    High Roller foreverincamo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    North.Canton, Ohio
    Posts
    1,577
    Chats: 0

    Default

    Anyone else old enough to remember New Orleans Saints place kicker Tom Dempsey? Other kickers wanted him booted out of the league because he was " cheating " by only having half a foot that he kicked with. He offered them all the opportunity to lose half their foot and kick like him. No one did it, obviously.
    Anyone can bowl like Belmo. Quit biatching and join him, or use one hand and defeat him.

  7. #17

    Default

    Belmo "cheats" the same way Couch "cheats" by using his left hand and having that part of the lane all to himself. In other words use what you got. We're all (mostly) born with two hands.

    Heck, if someone can bowl with their right foot more power to them.

  8. #18
    Ringer
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Southeast PA
    Posts
    506
    Chats: 0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike White View Post
    He is far from deadly accurate.

    Look at the number of times he leaves a WEAK 10 pin, only to get a messenger to take it out.

    The fact that he had a messenger at all indicates that he missed, because the headpin should transfer most of it's energy into the 2 pin, but since he hit light, the head pin just glanced off the 2 pin, and maintained plenty of energy to fly back across the deck.

    I blame ABC/USBC for falling asleep when ball companies presented resin balls.

    The change in friction between the ball and the lane has completely changed the game from one of art, into pure power. That acheivable increase in effective power is what allows Belmo to launch headpins off of the side walls, and increase his carry %.

    Then to make things worse, they put even more oil on the lane to compensate for what would otherwise be an unusable ball, and ALLOW that oil to guide the ball down the lane.

    High rev rate was achievable long before the thumbless style was around. It just wasn't as effective due to the lower friction between the ball and the lane. It was actually not hard to over-rev the ball so it skidded further.

    What we didn't see was high revs, high speed, and significant ball reaction at the same time.

    Using the equipment pre-resin, Belmo's technique (unchanged) would result in a 150-160 bowler, with trouble getting the 5 pin consistently. And that would be with the oil patterns in use pre-resin (much less volume of oil)

    His rev rate in the 500's, would only be effective in the 14-15mph range, and at that speed, you can forget launching messengers. That means his weak 10 pin shots would remain weak 10 pins.
    Belmonte has some of the best CATS data ever recorded. There is no question that he is one of, if the not the most, accurate bowlers currently on tour.

    https://www.11thframe.com/news/article/6452

  9. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NewToBowling View Post
    Belmo "cheats" the same way Couch "cheats" by using his left hand and having that part of the lane all to himself. In other words use what you got. We're all (mostly) born with two hands.

    Heck, if someone can bowl with their right foot more power to them.
    Funny you mention that. Ever think of the fact that so many right handers are so deep they actually burn up lay down areas of left handers? That is starting to happen more and more and causes problems for lefties in that regard in the later part of qualifying blocks.
    Last edited by fortheloveofbowling; 03-25-2015 at 03:48 AM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •