Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Storm Core and Cover strength chart

  1. #1
    Super Moderator
    bowl1820's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central, Florida
    Posts
    6,713
    Blog Entries
    12
    Chats: 554

    Default Storm Core and Cover strength chart

    This chart was posted by "REmarcaBOWL" that shows the strength of the Storm Cores and Covers in relation to each other.


    Right handed Stroker, high track ,about 13 degree axis tilt. PAP is located 5 9/16” over 1 3/4” up.Speed ave. about 14 mph at the pins. Medium rev’s.High Game 300, High series 798

    "Talent without training is nothing." Luke Skywalker

  2. #2
    SandBagger AlexNC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    269
    Chats: 0

    Default

    Thanks for sharing. Even though it may not be technical, I like being able to glance at this and compare some of the Storm products I have.

    I will say also that I like the update that Storm has done to their website. At first glance it may not seem as intuitive, but they have done a nice job laying out pages for each ball and providing the tech specs as well as what they view the intended purpose of the ball is.
    I am a proud member of Bowlingboards.com bowling Forums

  3. #3

    Default

    It's too bad that manufacturers refuse to give us the specifics on their cover materials in terms of oil absorption, COF in oil, and COF in dry. Just for fun, I looked at two of the balls that I have tried recently. The Storm Fight is rated 17/23 in terms of the core (fairly weak) and 7/17 in terms of the cover (fairly strong). The Roto Grip Wreck-it is rated 13/16 for core (fairly weak), and 18/25 for cover (also fairly weak). In terms of the actual reaction of the balls, once I polished it, the Fight immediately found a place in my arsenal. The Wreck-it just rolled early, regardless of what I did to the cover. It lasted about 3 games before I gave it away.

  4. #4
    Bowling Guru Amyers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    Posts
    3,991
    Chats: 32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobLV1 View Post
    It's too bad that manufacturers refuse to give us the specifics on their cover materials in terms of oil absorption, COF in oil, and COF in dry. Just for fun, I looked at two of the balls that I have tried recently. The Storm Fight is rated 17/23 in terms of the core (fairly weak) and 7/17 in terms of the cover (fairly strong). The Roto Grip Wreck-it is rated 13/16 for core (fairly weak), and 18/25 for cover (also fairly weak). In terms of the actual reaction of the balls, once I polished it, the Fight immediately found a place in my arsenal. The Wreck-it just rolled early, regardless of what I did to the cover. It lasted about 3 games before I gave it away.
    From what I've seen posted the Wreck-it is Crazy Strong not sure how that qualifies as an HP 2 ball I've heard multiple people say that it within a board or two of their No Rules. Would have thought that the higher rg core would have kept this from being an early rolling piece but apparently not. Another ball added to the pile of stuff that you have to be able to throw at 18 mph to use.
    I am a proud member of Bowlingboards.com bowling forums and ball contest winner

    Current arsenal

    900 Global Badger Claw - Radical Ridiculous Pearl - Spare Ball Ebonite T Zone

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •