I've sort of had this one rolling around in my mind for a bit. I think that for the common bowler it probably would tend to confuse him. I know that when I first started looking into the oil patterns the biggest problem I had was with "units." The units aren't actually a volume, and that's probably the hardest thing to grasp. And of course different oils take different amounts to make a "unit." While knowing what the pattern is or understanding the graphic layout of it is nice, it's true, you really can't know how it's going to play until you roll something on it.
I do take umbrage with the "heavy" oil patterns as to only having to do with length. I've bowled at places where the ball would almost have a rooster tail behind it from the pond they put out, but I've also seen longer patterns with less "volume" that played the same way. Maybe we need more than one designation for oil on a lane. Long and light, or short and heavy, for example.




					
				


					
					
					
					
				




  Since the switch, I now have the concept of shorter and lighter, which does give more break point snap - but also less on heads, so they tend to break down quicker even on synthetic to me atleast.  I can still play outside, but I have to be a little firmer and stand left of center.  I really don't care where I have to play, I just hate hearing I can't move left to get the ball to the pocket.  I have heard that so much there lately, that I just say "well don't move left or put your shoes on and go home.."  



Bookmarks