It is not really an issue of a number of commercials ran but more the number of viewers reached. Bowling does not have the fan base as other sports such as golf, MLB, NBA and NFL. Bowling has a certain demographic base which is low to middle income, not to say there aren't upper income individuals involved just fewer than most other sports. Bowling has been, for the most part, labeled a working mans sport. So the mentallity is that these demographics do not spend the kind of money needed to benefit the advertisers. The cost of an ad in a bowling tournament cost far less than does the very same commercial run in the Superbowl so the funds are much lower as is the number of people reached who are going to visit the business who ran the ad.
But not a only reason just a large one. The pro bowlers are sponsored and may receive funds, equipment, etc; but again they cannot invest too much money into them for there are hundreds of them, literally. For a tournament there are hundreds signed up to qualify but we only see 4 normally on Sunday yet the payout goes way down the list of entrants paying out to a level of 30 or more bowlers which cuts into the pot. Now if the only bowlers that got prize money were the finalists then they would see much larger winnings. If this were the case the bowling entries would suffer dramatically leaving just a few entered to bowl.
And on a final note the ads sold are not geared towards the payout but to pay the network to run them as it costs money to televise the game, pay the TV staff and so on.
Also another main factor is spectators. When you see a tournament there are less than, lets guess 300 people who paid to see the finals so there is no large revenues as opposed to a football game where there are 50 thousand plus paying to watch.
Bookmarks