meissen
10-21-2012, 04:31 PM
Hey guys,
Have two situation questions from the league we're on which is USBC sanctioned.
Situation 1: My parents, wife, and I are on a league with a handful of new teams. When we came in to bowl today, we saw that we had lost a portion of our points that the score sheet showed the previous week. We were told the teams we were bowling hadn't established their average yet so once their average was established they retroactively updated the past scores and we lost points that we thought we already had. Is this normal? I wouldn't have thought that their average gets applied retroactively...
Situation 2: The team who runs the league has a pregnant woman on the team. She only bowled a couple weeks and not long enough during the period of time where our averages are re-established (4 weeks in the bi-laws). Since her average wasn't established this year, they're saying that when she comes back to bowling next season that they're going to have to create a new average for her and it sounds fishy to us... What's the point of having USBC sanctioning if the USBC averages don't apply or carry over from past seasons?
We're not knowledable about USBC sanctions and we're trying to just bowl for fun, but the sandbagging and politics that appear to go on in the league really has been ruining it for us lately. We bowled our hearts out at the beginning of last season and were all happy with all the points we were winning only to realize the good bowlers were sandbagging to keep their averages low to get higher handicaps. :mad: Are we overreacting to the above two situations or are they messing with the scoring?
Have two situation questions from the league we're on which is USBC sanctioned.
Situation 1: My parents, wife, and I are on a league with a handful of new teams. When we came in to bowl today, we saw that we had lost a portion of our points that the score sheet showed the previous week. We were told the teams we were bowling hadn't established their average yet so once their average was established they retroactively updated the past scores and we lost points that we thought we already had. Is this normal? I wouldn't have thought that their average gets applied retroactively...
Situation 2: The team who runs the league has a pregnant woman on the team. She only bowled a couple weeks and not long enough during the period of time where our averages are re-established (4 weeks in the bi-laws). Since her average wasn't established this year, they're saying that when she comes back to bowling next season that they're going to have to create a new average for her and it sounds fishy to us... What's the point of having USBC sanctioning if the USBC averages don't apply or carry over from past seasons?
We're not knowledable about USBC sanctions and we're trying to just bowl for fun, but the sandbagging and politics that appear to go on in the league really has been ruining it for us lately. We bowled our hearts out at the beginning of last season and were all happy with all the points we were winning only to realize the good bowlers were sandbagging to keep their averages low to get higher handicaps. :mad: Are we overreacting to the above two situations or are they messing with the scoring?