Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 73

Thread: New Article... Feedback?

  1. #21

    Default

    FYI: IMHO... cover materials = little difference, if any. Symmetrical vs. Asymmetrical cores = the difference is HUGE! "NewtoBowling": please don't take a statement like "All balls are asymmetrical once they're drilled" literally. Throw the Radical Ridiculous next to the Radical Ridiculous Asym and see if your quote really applies!

  2. #22

    Default

    As to the "assymetric" comment....it's simple. If I ask you what the difference is between assymetric cores and symmetric cores...what are you going to tell me? Probably...that symmetric cores are more smooth arc shape and assymetric more angular.

    Asymmetric generally give you more options to obtain a stronger reaction whether it is a super rolly or super angular reaction via more drilling options. That is not to say symmetrical balls can't be both but when looking for extremes asymmetric are usually the choice. Many top players tend to stay away from asymmetric because of their extreme reactions though.

    So...if I ask you to describe to me "skid/flip"....you're going to say it's where the ball skids longer...then "flips".

    Yes.

    So when you ask these questions...and the definition of "skid/flip" and "assymetric cores" are similar...it begs the question...how does a symmetric core 'help' a ball be "skid/flip"? Just like...why would you want a "dull" "skid/flip" ball? Isn't the point...that the ball skids? Doesn't adding surface reduce said "skidding"?

    [B]On any ball pin placement is huge and on a symmetric ball it is the real key. For instance, for me i will always go pin up with a symmetric if i want more down lane reaction. It all depends on your pap, axis tilit, axis rotation. What you are looking for anytime with any degree of dull or shiny surface is where is this ball going to SLOW DOWN and what will it do when it does. If i have a dull surface and pearl surface ball with the same weight block and drilled the same and i can REPEAT 2 SHOTS IN A ROW you will see the dull ball slow down sooner played in a oil line. Entry Angle Entry Angle Entry Angle via controlling where a ball slows down and starts to make its way to the pocket.

    These type of questions are where the bowling ball industry has kinda fallen flat on their face a bit...they have so many variables in their specs....that some seem to contradict each other. It lends even more to Rob's article discussion...because when a company adds "pearl, hybrid, solid"...and those things don't really mean anything...then what else doesn't really mean anything? Differential? Core (symmetric/assymetric)?

    I guarantee for instance with the same drilling a Optimus Pearl and Optimus Solid with the same weight block and cover except for 1 being dull and the shiny you will see them slow down in different spots. But you have to repeat shots in order to see differences some times. What we have to remember is ball companies make these high performance balls with higher level players in mind in order to create slight variances for fine tuning. They make lower price balls for beginners that don't need to think about these differences. All ball specs and covers mean something. There is no conspiracy in the ball industry just the knowledge that people like all of us constantly are looking for a edge or a ball combination that fits our game. That is why companies are constantly trying to come up with different ideas and innovations, so they can make the game easier for us.

    Ball motion/specs are based in physics. Physics doesn't change. There has to be constant truths when it comes to Physics. It can't be "well, some companies the motion as it relates to the core is different..." Nope. Can't do that. You're violating the rules of Physics. If an assymetric core gives X reaction...and you want Y reaction...then the X reaction is not preferable towards obtaining the Y reaction. If it's meaningless...then it's meaningless. Like cover materials. Either they are or are not...chemically different. And said chemical difference either does or does not affect the ball motion. The chemistry can't be "variable"...you can't pick up the ball and sometimes it chemically is one way and other times chemically a different way.

    Ball motion physics would only apply if everyone threw the ball the same way the same speed on the same exact condition always. The physics of a ball are there to be manipulated via drilling, release and lane play. It is a bowlers job to learn how to do these things.

    Roto Grip traditionally for the most part make more rolling types of balls and storm traditionally for the most part make more skid flip type. There is you difference within the same ownership even.

    Covers do change after oil absorption, you know that.


    The industry needs to be honest about what matters and what doesn't....what makes a ball go longer versus shorter...what makes a ball react in an angular way versus a smoother arc way...and those have to ALWAYS be true...not various versions of 'true' depending on the company, ball, star allignement, moon phases, and el nino effects.[/QUOTE]

    It all matters we just have to be smart in our purchases and drilling and surface options in relation to what conditions you bowl on. But ultimately you have to be able to throw consistent shots and pay attention to learn differences. There are no absolute truths in bowling ball technology and reaction between different bowlers. We are all different and you have to learn what combinations of drilling, surfaces, releases, lane play works in a given situation. Again, throw the ball, watch the ball, learn learn learn.
    Last edited by fortheloveofbowling; 03-07-2016 at 06:32 PM.

  3. #23
    Super Moderator
    bowl1820's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central, Florida
    Posts
    6,713
    Blog Entries
    12
    Chats: 554

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobLV1 View Post
    FYI: IMHO... cover materials = little difference, if any. Symmetrical vs. Asymmetrical cores = the difference is HUGE! "NewtoBowling": please don't take a statement like "All balls are asymmetrical once they're drilled" literally. Throw the Radical Ridiculous next to the Radical Ridiculous Asym and see if your quote really applies!
    I think I would rephrase that.

    More like "All balls are Asymmetrical once they are drilled, But the difference in the level asymmetry between a drilled Symmetrical and a drilled Asymmetrical ball can be huge."

    Right handed Stroker, high track ,about 13 degree axis tilt. PAP is located 5 9/16” over 1 3/4” up.Speed ave. about 14 mph at the pins. Medium rev’s.High Game 300, High series 798

    "Talent without training is nothing." Luke Skywalker

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bowl1820 View Post
    I think I would rephrase that.

    More like "All balls are Asymmetrical once they are drilled, But the difference in the level asymmetry between a drilled Symmetrical and a drilled Asymmetrical ball can be huge."
    You always have been more PC than I am! LOL

  5. #25
    Super Moderator
    bowl1820's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central, Florida
    Posts
    6,713
    Blog Entries
    12
    Chats: 554

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobLV1 View Post
    You always have been more PC than I am! LOL
    It's not a matter of being "PC", the statement that "All balls are Asymmetrical once they are drilled" is true. To say it can't be taken literally would be wrong.

    But while the statement is true, it leaves out a vital piece of information. Regarding the difference in the level of Asymmetry a drilled Symmetrical ball will have as compared to a ball with built in Asymmetry.

    Right handed Stroker, high track ,about 13 degree axis tilt. PAP is located 5 9/16” over 1 3/4” up.Speed ave. about 14 mph at the pins. Medium rev’s.High Game 300, High series 798

    "Talent without training is nothing." Luke Skywalker

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bowl1820 View Post
    I think I would rephrase that.

    More like "All balls are Asymmetrical once they are drilled, But the difference in the level asymmetry between a drilled Symmetrical and a drilled Asymmetrical ball can be huge."
    That was what I was getting at...you just worded it better.

  7. #27
    High Roller Blacksox1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Coastal Florida
    Posts
    1,672
    Chats: 0

    Default

    Well...lets just say I got weird looks in the elevator at the casino in Vegas...and two people asked me "What is that?" Having to explain a bowling ball de-oiler to drunk people in an elevator...is nearly impossible.

    The above quote is one reason Aslan is so good for bowling.
    Hammer Purple Urethane. Storm Surge Hybrid, Storm Pitch Purple, Roto Grip Hyper Cell.
    2 Storm Surge Pearl 4x4x2 and a no flare, ,Roto Grip Hot Cell, Roto Grip Haywire.
    2020/2021, Hi Average 219, Hi Game 289, Hi Series 771, 30 Clean 4, 700 Series 16.
    2021/2022, Hi Average 211, Hi Game 256 Hi Series 693, 30 Clean 0, 700 Series 0.
    Proud member of Bowlingboards.com Since 2013.

  8. #28
    Bowling Guru Amyers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    Posts
    3,991
    Chats: 32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aslan View Post
    Well...lets just say I got weird looks in the elevator at the casino in Vegas...and two people asked me "What is that?" Having to explain a bowling ball de-oiler to drunk people in an elevator...is nearly impossible.

    As to the "assymetric" comment....it's simple. If I ask you what the difference is between assymetric cores and symmetric cores...what are you going to tell me? Probably...that symmetric cores are more smooth arc shape and assymetric more angular.

    So...if I ask you to describe to me "skid/flip"....you're going to say it's where the ball skids longer...then "flips".

    So when you ask these questions...and the definition of "skid/flip" and "assymetric cores" are similar...it begs the question...how does a symmetric core 'help' a ball be "skid/flip"? Just like...why would you want a "dull" "skid/flip" ball? Isn't the point...that the ball skids? Doesn't adding surface reduce said "skidding"?

    These type of questions are where the bowling ball industry has kinda fallen flat on their face a bit...they have so many variables in their specs....that some seem to contradict each other. It lends even more to Rob's article discussion...because when a company adds "pearl, hybrid, solid"...and those things don't really mean anything...then what else doesn't really mean anything? Differential? Core (symmetric/assymetric)?

    Ball motion/specs are based in physics. Physics doesn't change. There has to be constant truths when it comes to Physics. It can't be "well, some companies the motion as it relates to the core is different..." Nope. Can't do that. You're violating the rules of Physics. If an assymetric core gives X reaction...and you want Y reaction...then the X reaction is not preferable towards obtaining the Y reaction. If it's meaningless...then it's meaningless. Like cover materials. Either they are or are not...chemically different. And said chemical difference either does or does not affect the ball motion. The chemistry can't be "variable"...you can't pick up the ball and sometimes it chemically is one way and other times chemically a different way.

    The industry needs to be honest about what matters and what doesn't....what makes a ball go longer versus shorter...what makes a ball react in an angular way versus a smoother arc way...and those have to ALWAYS be true...not various versions of 'true' depending on the company, ball, star allignement, moon phases, and el nino effects.
    Wow you do realize there are more asymmetrical even rolling solid balls on the market than there are shiny skid flip asymmetrical balls?

    Asymmetrical has nothing to do with the arc of a bowling balls hook. It has to do with how well the ball retains it tilt allowing the ball to have a more pronounced motions. They are typically used in balls that are ment for heavy oil or when a longer hook phase is needed.

    Asymmetry by itself doesn't create a specific motion and is nearly to enhance the motion and characteristics provided by the surface, cover stock, RG, and differential.

    You can find skid flip balls that are symmetrical or arcing motion asymmetrical balls. The Brunswick Nirvana isn't skid flip neither is the Rotogrip Hyper Cell both asymmetrical.

    Ball motion is created by the surface, cover stock, RG, and differential not by the core shape. Core shape can only enhance or detract from certain characteristics not create them.

  9. #29
    Bowling God Aslan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Hutchinson, KS
    Posts
    7,122
    Chats: 204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amyers View Post
    Wow you do realize there are more asymmetrical even rolling solid balls on the market than there are shiny skid flip asymmetrical balls?

    Asymmetrical has nothing to do with the arc of a bowling balls hook. It has to do with how well the ball retains it tilt allowing the ball to have a more pronounced motions. They are typically used in balls that are ment for heavy oil or when a longer hook phase is needed.

    Asymmetry by itself doesn't create a specific motion and is nearly to enhance the motion and characteristics provided by the surface, cover stock, RG, and differential.

    You can find skid flip balls that are symmetrical or arcing motion asymmetrical balls. The Brunswick Nirvana isn't skid flip neither is the Rotogrip Hyper Cell both asymmetrical.

    Ball motion is created by the surface, cover stock, RG, and differential not by the core shape. Core shape can only enhance or detract from certain characteristics not create them.


    I have no idea what you're talking about...but it sounds really, really smart. I think I'm just not grasping the concept just yet.

    To me...symmetric core balls...make a very arc-like motion. Like a backwards "C". Assymetric balls, it's more like a "Y", but with the right part of the 'y' taken off....like a backwards hockey stick.

    It seems...that if a person wants a ball to go long and "snap"...they would want a combination of the following:
    1) A polished surface...a 'shiny' ball...so it will go a LONG way and retain as much energy as possible (or not slow down too soon as FTLOB would term it).
    2) Maybe a pearl...versus a solid...although...we're starting to agree that may be a minor factor.
    3) An assymetric ("Y", backwards hockey stick type shape) core that will really change direction once it stops skidding and transitions to the hook phase.

    If the above...IF...the above is a true...generally agreeable...mostly true description of how to make a ball go "long and snap"....then it MUST be true...it MUST be true...that the opposite of those things works AGAINST a "going long and snapping" ball motion. It CANNOT....by the rules of logic...be that those 3 things are true....yet the opposite is also true. If you throw a symmetric (ignore drilling...I think that's more 'mumbo jumbo') ball that is sanded to 350 abralon with a solid cover....it CANNOT be as skid/flip or long/snap...as a pearl, polished, assymetric core ball. It CANNOT. If it is...then those 3 factors are meaningless in terms of ball motion. You can't have two different truths...with conflicting premises...be true. You would either defy logic...or defy physics...or both.
    In Bag: (: .) Zen Master Solid; (: .) Perfect Mindset; (: .) Brunswick Endeavor; (: .) Outer Limits Pearl; (: .) Ebonite Maxim
    USBC#: 8259-59071; USBC Sanctioned Average = 192; Lifetime Average = 172;
    Ball Speed: 14.7mph; Rev. Rate: 240rpm || High Game (sanc.) = 300 (268); High Series (sanc.) = 725 (720); Clean Games: 198

    Smokey this is not 'Nam', this is bowling. There are rules. Proud two-time winner of a bowlingboards.com weekly ball give-away!

  10. #30

    Default

    This thread has taken a great turn to illustrate the point of this article.

    I commented on the quote, "All balls are asymmetrical once they are drilled," to which Bowl1820 clarified that balls with asymmetrical cores are MORE asymmetrical once they are drilled. The quoted statement joins many others that I will list in a moment in stopping our understanding of bowling balls. Consider: if you have memorized the statement that "All balls are asymmetrical once they are drilled," you don't need to look any further. If, however, you WATCH the differences between balls with symmetrical cores and those with asymmetrical cores in the hands of actual bowlers, it becomes very apparent that balls with asymmetrical cores magnify inconsistencies in bowler's releases much more than balls with symmetrical cores do. This is the value of a discussion of symmetrical vs. asymmetrical cores in bowling balls.

    Other statements that are equally as limiting include:

    Surface determines 85% of ball reaction.
    When balls start straightening out as a session progresses it's because of carry down.
    Pin up balls go longer than pin down balls.
    Pearl balls go longer than solid balls.
    Green balls hook more than other colors.
    The "best" balls are the ones that cost the most.
    The OOB finish is the one that works the best for a particular ball.
    and finally... my personal favorite...
    One ball hooks more than another ball.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •