Just for those that are still not quite sure what BLM is really after...
1) They have a plan put forward (good). The (bad) is; included in that plan are such things as "broken windows policing".
2) There are some vocal civil rights folks in that organization that are trying to use it's visibility to re-open the "reparations" debate.
For those not up on these issues, the summary is this:
1) There's a big push right now to let criminals out of jail who haven't committed violent crimes. This has already been done in California and we're already (< a year later) seeing double-digit increases in violent and non-violent crimes as a result. The next stage in this "broken window policy" is to not arrest people for non-violent crimes. The person most likely to run for Barbara Boxer's soon to be vacant seat in the Senate is Kamala Harris who has been on record suggesting that perhaps a person breaking into a business or home should just receive a ticket.
2) "Reparations" is the worst case for Democrats. I KNEW when BLM got traction, we'd eventually get to this. Reparations are monetary payouts to anyone who is black. These monetary payouts are designed to compensate them for the time of slavery. Every attempt to even address this issue has failed miserably. Legally, it's a complete losing effort. And even in regions where blacks make up a larger percentage of the electorate...this issue can't get traction. Recently, Bernie Sanders was shouted down at a town hall my a couple African Americans about reparations. He quickly, and smartly, said he does not support reparations.
The trick will be, what will Hillary do in that situation. So long as she doesn't see Bernie as a real threat...she can ignore the issue...or try to deflect the question. But if Bernie keeps momentum going...and she's cornered...she may agree on reparations to get the black vote...and that would be HORRIBLE for the Democrats in the general election. While some states in the South have up to 70% of their Democratic base African American...blacks make up only 13% of the US population, less than 40% of any one state, and participate (vote) at about the same rate as other races (66%, 2/3).
Since over half the electorate is moderate, and the general election will pit a democrat against a republican...and the republican will definitely oppose reparations...an issue like reparations could easily tip the balance in favor of Republicans. With the primaries being so polarized and everyone is pushed to the extremes, this is probably the first election where a moderate 3rd party candidate could win.
When this nightmare started I predicted Rubio would defeat Clinton in the general election. I currently think it'll be John Kasich beating Clinton instead. I think Rubio lost the election when he and Bush split from one another. But the New Hampshire debate also kinda killed him. He's now being seen as an establishment candidate in a party that bitterly hates establishment anythings. It's ironic that FoxNews and right ring AM radio has pushed the party so far to the right...that they are rejecting establishment candidates.
And it really doesn't matter at this point. With Congress so divided...nothing major is getting through. They can't overturn Obamacare. They can't agree on Supreme Court justices. There's really no chance to get anything done with the filibuster in play...so it's more entertainment than anything.
Bookmarks