I'm not sure what I want to say here, So I'm breaking this down into parts. Maybe the thought will come out.
True, there's a river of oil up the middle of the lane.Many of these shots feature oil ratios as much as 10:1 (ten times as much oil in the middle part of the lane as there is on the outside).
Something about this is doesn't sit right. I guess partly because your basing it on "Units" which is a old term these days. When today conditions are looked more at in terms of volume and/or length.As the USBC requires that there be at least three units of oil from gutter to gutter for the entire length of the pattern, this means that there can be as many as thirty units of oil on the middle part of the lane.
and the ball designations are geared toward that IMO.
No not obviously.So, here's the question: if there are thirty units of oil on the middle part of the lane, this would obviously be considered heavy oil,
What's obvious here is that the middle part of the lane has more oil compared to the 3 unit minimum that was put on the outside in this example, but it wouldn't necessarily be a "heavy oil" pattern compared to other patterns.while the three units of oil on the outside is so little that modern balls don't even recognize that it's there, and the transitional area of heavy to light would be somewhere around ten to fifteen units,
Since this is being discussed in units, Using the old definitions a layer of oil 100-plus units would have been considered "Heavy oil" and anything less than 50 units would have been "Light oil.
I'd say no, While yes the middle of the lane has more oil than the outside, that doesn't automatically make that "heavy oil" that you'd necessarily would want to use what is currently considered a heavy oil ball on.doesn't the designation of certain balls as heavy oil, medium oil, or light oil really just depend on the part of the lane the bowler CHOOSES to play rather than a "lane condition"?
I'm not really happy with how I worded this, but I'll go with it.
I'm taking a guess that the idea your looking at is to maybe have players look at (and choose) balls by where their used (on the lane), instead of how they are currently being perceived to be used by the designation's currently being used to describe them (the balls) .
Bookmarks